Impact of villitis of unknown etiology and adverse acute neonatal outcomes in Eastern Ontario.

INTRODUCTION: Villitis of unknown etiology (VUE) is a histopathological lesion associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. We seek to define the obscure relationship between the severity and distribution of VUE and adverse neonatal outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of pathologic findings from singleton placentas diagnosed with VUE between 2013 and 2019. Control placentas were matched 1:1 for gestational age and presence/absence of fetal IUGR. Neonatal outcomes of interest included: newborn resuscitation, NICU admission, Apgar scores and cord blood acidosis. Odds ratio and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated with controls as the reference. RESULTS: 452 placentas were included. 35 % of pregnancies were complicated by IUGR. When analyzed by severity (low-grade: OR = 4.75 [2.86-8.14]; high-grade: OR = 4.76 [2.71-8.79]) and distribution (focal: OR = 5.24 [2.87-10.17]; multifocal: OR = 4.90 [2.90-8.59]), VUE was significantly associated with need for newborn resuscitation. No other neonatal outcomes of interest were significantly associated with VUE diagnosis. DISCUSSION: We determined a statistically significant association between VUE severity and distribution and the need for newborn resuscitation. VUE lesions were not associated with any additional neonatal outcomes of interest. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to confirm these associations for obstetric and neonatal case management.

Etiology of stillbirth in a tertiary care center: a retrospective cohort study assessing ultrasound, laboratory, and pathology investigations.

BACKGROUND: Canadian stillbirth data are limited, and a significant proportion of pregnancies resulting in stillbirth have no attributable cause. The objective of this study was to characterize stillbirth case investigations and management at a tertiary care hospital in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review study of all cases of singleton stillbirth at The Ottawa Hospital between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2017. Terminations and multiples stillbirths were excluded. Chart reviews were conducted to extract maternal sociodemographic, obstetrical, and fetal characteristics, including results from antenatal ultrasounds, autopsy, placenta pathology, and laboratory investigations. RESULTS: A total of 155 eligible cases of stillbirth were identified, resulting in a 6-year stillbirth rate of 4.2 per 1000 total births. The median maternal age was 31.0 years (IQR: 29.0, 35.0) and the median gestational age at delivery was 28 weeks (IQR: 24, 35). A total of 9 (5.8%) pregnant individuals had a history of previous stillbirth. Of the 155 stillbirths, 35% underwent the full suite of post-loss laboratory, placental, and fetal autopsy investigations. 63.2% of cases had post-loss laboratory investigations completed. 76% and 71% of cases had fetal autopsy and placenta pathology evaluations completed, respectively. Antenatal characteristics associated with stillbirth included fetal anomalies/genetic markers (27.1%), umbilical cord and placental anomalies (24.5%), fetal growth abnormalities (27.7%), cervical/uterine abnormalities (11.6%), and amniotic fluid abnormalities (25.1%). The most common autopsy findings included evidence of infection (22.7%), fetal anomalies (12.6%), and fetal hypoxia (10%). The most common placental pathology findings included features of placental insufficiency (21.8%), retroplacental abnormalities (16.3%), and umbilical cord accident/infarct (15.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that as many as two-thirds of singleton stillbirth cases at our center did not receive the post-perinatal loss investigations recommended by clinical practice guidelines. More thorough collection of post-stillbirth data at all levels (institutional, provincial, national) is warranted to improve our understanding of stillbirth epidemiology, etiology, and management in Canada.

Association of distinct features of villitis of unknown etiology histopathology and fetal growth restriction diagnosis in a retrospective cohort from Eastern Ontario.

INTRODUCTION: Villitis of unknown etiology (VUE) is associated with fetal growth restriction (FGR) and adverse short-term neonatal outcomes. No investigation to date has found which VUE features are driving the association with FGR diagnosis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of placenta pathology specimens (2013-2017) was conducted. Independent variables of interest were: VUE distribution (focal vs diffuse), location (basal vs non-basal), and grade (high vs low). The primary outcome was FGR, and secondary outcomes were neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, NICU length of stay, Apgar scores <7 at 1, 5, and 10-min, and recurrence rate of villitis in subsequent pregnancies. Association between VUE characteristics and our primary outcome were investigated using logistic regression. Secondary outcomes were explored with regression analyses and recurrence rate of VUE for members of the cohort with a recorded subsequent pregnancy was calculated. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty seven placentas were included. Adjusted models showed no difference in the odds of FGR between high-grade versus low-grade VUE [aOR 1.25 95% CI (0.50, 3.26), p = 0.6], focal/multi-focal vs diffuse cases [aOR 1.03 95% CI (0.28, 4.34), p = >0.9], and basal vs non-basal VUE [aOR 0.06 95% CI (0.00, 1.10), p = 0.058]. After adjusting for prematurity <37 weeks, there were lower odds of NICU admission in basal vs non-basal cases [aOR 0.25, 95% CI (0.06, 0.90), p = 0.048). There was no difference in the odds of neonates presenting with Apgar <7 for the distinct VUE histopathology features. Three cases had recurrent VUE, resulting in a 6.8% [95% CI (3.02%, 10.61%)] recurrence rate. All recurrent cases were high-grade and identified with basal localization. DISCUSSION: There are no statistical associations between distinct VUE features and FGR diagnosis, however location of villitis may be associated with worse neonatal outcomes. Villitis of any type (severity, degree, location) could potentially drive insufficient placental function and poor fetal growth.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department visits and infant health: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The novel SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has provided a set of unique challenges for paediatric patients requiring emergency care across the globe. Reduction in paediatric emergency department (ED) usage during the COVID-19 pandemic has been widely reported, but no studies to date have consolidated and described what ramifications these reductions may have on neonatal and infant health. This scoping review aims to characterise the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on infant ED visits and neonatal and infant health. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A comprehensive literature search will be conducted from March 2020 to July 2022 using the following databases: Embase (Ovid), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), Medline (Ovid) and CINAHL (EBSCOhost). This scoping review will use a five-step framework to guide the selection, extraction and analysis of data from eligible studies, with an additional sixth step for clinical consultation. Studies in English reporting the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on infant ED visits, as well as neonatal and infant health, will be included for screening. Key findings will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics board approval will not be required due to the nature of the study design. The results of this scoping review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at academic conferences.